The primary goal of Spinal Cord Stimulation is to reduce or block pain signals before they reach the brain, helping patients regain control over their pain without relying on excessive medication. SCS is not a cure for the underlying condition, but it is an effective tool for managing chronic pain that has not responded to physical therapy, injections, or prior surgeries. Many patients who undergo SCS report improved mobility, reduced stress and anxiety related to pain, and enhanced overall well-being. By masking pain with gentle electrical pulses, SCS allows individuals to focus on daily activities rather than being constantly burdened by discomfort.
While SCS can be a life-changing treatment, it isn’t for everyone. It is most effective for nerve-related pain and may not be as beneficial for mechanical or inflammatory pain conditions. Some patients experience partial relief rather than complete pain elimination, and effectiveness can vary from person to person. Additionally, the device requires ongoing management, including periodic adjustments and battery replacements for rechargeable systems.
Another limitation is that insurance coverage may vary, requiring patients to undergo a trial period before permanent implantation. While the treatment can significantly reduce pain, it does not treat the underlying cause of the pain, meaning some conditions may continue to progress despite symptom relief.
As with any medical procedure, SCS carries some risks, though complications are rare. Some potential risks include:
The SCS procedure involves two main phases: the trial phase and the permanent implant.
There are different types of SCS devices, each designed to meet the unique needs of the patient:
Each patient’s condition, preferences, and lifestyle determine which type of SCS system will provide the best long-term pain relief.
Kyphoplasty is most effective for acute or subacute compression fractures, meaning fractures that are relatively recent and still causing pain. Some of the common types include:
The type and severity of the fracture determine whether kyphoplasty or another treatment approach is best.